🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year backed the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass half. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he does so then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. So there was some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.