🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.